|
Article
Mode de vie et affinités de Paschatherium (Condylarthra, Hyopsopontidae) d'après ses os du tarse
Published online: 16/12/1996
Keywords:
Astragalus; Calcaneum; Condylarthra; Eocene; Functional morphology; Paschatherium; PHYLOGENY
https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.25.2-4.225-242
References: 43
Cite this article:
Marc Godinot, Thierry Smith and Richard Smith, 1996. Mode de vie et affinités de Paschatherium (Condylarthra, Hyopsopontidae) d'après ses os du tarse. PalaeoVertebrata 25 (2-4): 225-242. doi: 10.18563/pv.25.2-4.225-242
Export citation
Abstract
Tarsals that can be confidently attributed to Paschatheríum dolloi from Dormaal (Belgium) are described. The astragalus is short; its broad neck is set at an angle of 30 degrees to the trochlea. The trochlea is pulley-shaped and proximally extended. There is no astragalar foramen. The medial tibial facet extends distally in a cup deeply excavated in the neck and buttressed. The sustentacular facet extends toward the navicular facet but is not fully confluent with it. The calcaneum bears a proximo-distally extended proximal facet for the astragalus. A relatively large peroneal tubercle projects from the body, and is situated distally. Functionally, the trochlea indicates extensive flexion-extension movements of the foot. Calcaneo-astragalar facets indicate sliding and rotation between the two tarsals. The inclination of the navicular facet suggests frequent foot inversion. The peroneal tubercle reflects good muscular capacities for foot rotation. Overall morphology is interpreted as a scansorial adaptation similar to that of sciurids.Comparisons are made with the tarsals of Macrocranion vandebroeki from Dormaal and Hyopsodus paulus from the Bridgerian of Wyoming. Some similarities between the astragali of Paschatherium and Macrocraníon (trochlea) are interpreted as convergences for rapid locomotion. However absence of mobility at the lower ankle and midtarsal joints in M. vandebroekzi suggests that this species was cursorial, as is known for M. tenerum from Messel. Similarities in the calcanea of Paschatherium and Hyopsodus are probably the result of close phylogenetic relations, and confirm the placement of Paschatherium in the hyopsodontids. The differences in the calcanea of Paschatherium and Macrocranion underline that Paschatherium is distinct from erinaceomorph insectivores. The differences in astragalar morphology between Paschatherium and Hyopsodus show that a marked adaptive divergence separates the two genera. We speculate about the common occurrence of a deep tibial cup (“cotylar fossa”) and a pulley-shaped trochlea in Paschatherium and hyracoids, suggesting that an adaptive scenario similar to that having led to Paschatherium (scansoriality) might explain the acquisition of the peculiar hyracoid tarsal characters; such a scenario contradicts the concept of Pantomesaxonia. Other peculiar characters of Hyopsodus suggest that hyopsodontids might be given more consideration in the search for hyracoid (and tethythere) origins.
Published in Vol. 25, Fasc. 2-4 (1996)
References
CIFELLI, R.L., 1982. — The petrosal structure of Hyopsodus with respect to that of some other ungulates, and its phylogenetic implications. J. Paleont., 56: 795-805.
CIFELLI, R.L., 1983. — Eutherian tarsals from the late Paleocene of Brazil. Am. Mus. Novitates, 2761: 1-31.
COLLINSON, M.E. & HOOKER, J.J., 1987. — Vegetational and mammalian faunal changes in the early Tertiary of southern England. In: Origins of Angiosperms and their Biological Consequences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 259-303.
DENYS, C. & RUSSELL, D.E., 1981. — Étude de la variabilité dentaire d'une population de Paschatherium (condylarthre hyopsodontidé), provenant de la localité sparnacienne de Dormaal (Belgique). Bull. Inf. Géol. Bassin Paris, 18: 37-45.
ESTRAVÍS, C. & RUSSELL, D.E., 1992. — Paschatherium marianae, un nouveau Condylarthra de Silveirinha, Éocène inférieur du Portugal. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., (4e Sér., C), 14: 185-203.
FISCHER, M.S., 1986. — Die Stellung der Schliefer (Hyracoidea) im phylogenetischen System der Eutheria. Cour. Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg, 84: 1-132.
FISCHER, M.S. & TASSY, P., 1993. — The interrelation between Proboscidea, Sirenia, Hyracoidea, and Mesaxonia: the morphological evidence. In: SZALAY, F.S., NOVACEK, M.J. & McKENNA, M.C. (Eds.), Mammal Phylogeny, Vol. 2, Placentals. Springer Verlag, New York, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9246-0_16
GAZIN, C.L., 1965. — A study of the early Tertiary condylarthran mammal Meniscotherium. Smiths. Misc. Coll., 149: 1-98.
GAZIN, C.L., 1968. — A study of the Eocene condylarthran mammal Hyopsodus. Smiths. Misc. Coll., 153: 1-90.
GINGERICH, P.D., RUSSELL, D.E. & WELLS, N.A., 1990. — Astragalus of Anthracobune (Mammalia, Proboscidea) from the early-middle Eocene of Kashmir. Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Michigan, 28: 71-77.
GODINOT, M., 1978. — Diagnoses de trois nouvelles espèces de mammifères du Sparnacien de Provence. C. R. somm. Soc. Géol. Fr., (6): 286-288.
GODINOT, M., 1981. — Les mammifères de Rians (Éocène inférieur, Provence). Palaeovertebrata, 10: 43-126. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.10.2.43-126
GODINOT, M. & PRASAD, G.V.R., 1994. — Discovery of Cretaceous arboreal eutherians. Naturwissenschaften, 81: 79-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138464
GUNNELL, G.F., 1989. — Evolutionary history of Microsyopoidea (Mammalia, ?Primates) and the relationship between Plesiadapiformes and Primates. Univ. Michigan Pap. Paleont., 27: 1-157.
GUNNELL, G.F. & GINGERICH, P.D., 1991. — Systematics and evolution of late Paleocene and early Eocene Oxyaenidae (Mammalia, Creodonta) in the Clarks Fork Basin, Wyoming. Contr. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Michigan, 28: 141-180.
HOOKER, J.J. & INSOLE, A.N., 1980. — The distribution of mammals in the English Palaeogene. Tertiary Research, Rotterdam, 3: 31-45.
JENKINS, F.A. & McCLEARN, D., 1984. — Mechanisms of hind foot reversal in climbing mammals. J. Morph., 182: 197-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051820207
JOUFFROY, F.K., 1962. — La musculature des membres chez les lémuriens de Madagascar. Étude descriptive et comparative. Mammalia, Vol. Sup., Paris, 326 p.
LEWIS, O.J., 1989. — Functional Morphology of the Evolving Hand and Foot. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 359 p.
MacPHEE, R.D.E., 1994. — Morphology, adaptations, and relationships of Plesiorycteropus, and a diagnosis of a new order of eutherian mammals. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 220: 1-214.
MARANDAT, B., 1989. — Mammifères nouveaux de l'Ilerdien des Corbières et du Minervois (Bas-Languedoc, France). Palaeovertebrata, 19: 161-167. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.19.3.161-167
MARANDAT, B., 1991. — Mammifères de l'Ilerdien Moyen (Éocène Inférieur) des Corbières et du Minervois (Bas-Languedoc, France); Systématique, biostratigraphie, corrélations. Palaeovertebrata, 20: 55-144. https://doi.org/10.18563/pv.20.2-3.55-144
MATTHEW, W.D., 1927. — The evolution of mammals in the Eocene. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 947-985. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1927.tb07439.x
NOVACEK, M.J., 1985. — The Sespedectinae; a new subfamily of hedgehog-like insectivores. Am. Mus. Novitates, 2822: 1-24.
NOVACEK, M.J., WYSS, A.R. & McKENNA, M.C., 1988. — The major groups of eutherian mammals. In: BENTON, M.J. (Ed.), The Phylogeny and Classification of the Tetrapods, Vol. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 31-71.
PRASAD, G.V.R. & GODINOT, M., 1994. — Eutherian tarsal bones from the late Cretaceous of India. J. Paleont., 68: 892-902. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022336000026342
PROTHERO, D.R., 1993. — Ungulate phylogeny: molecular vs. morphological evidence. In: SZALAY, F.S., NOVACEK, M.J. & McKENNA, M.C. (Eds.), Mammal Phylogeny, Vol. 2, Placentals. Springer Verlag, New York, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9246-0_13
RASMUSSEN, D.T., GAGNON, M. & SIMONS, E.L., 1990. — Taxeopody in the carpus and tarsus of Oligocene Pliohyracidae (Mammalia: Hyracoidea) and the phyletic position of Hyraxes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 4688-4691. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.87.12.4688
ROMER, A.S., 1966. — Vertebrate Paleontology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 468 p.
RUSSELL, D.E., 1964. — Les mammifères paléocènes d'Europe. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., (Sér. C), 13: 1-324.
RUSSELL, D.E., LOUIS, P. & SAVAGE, D.E., 1975. — Les Adapisoricidae de l'Éocène Inférieur de France. Réévaluation des formes considérées affines. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., (3e Sér.), 327: 129-194.
SHOSHANI, J., 1992. — The controversy continues: an overview of evidence for Hyracoidea-Tethytheria affinity. Israel J. Zool., 38: 233-244.
SMITH, T. & SMITH, R., 1994. — Le genre Dormaalius QUINET, 1964 de l'Éocène inférieur de Belgique, synonyme du genre Macrouranion WEITZEL, 1949 (Mammalia, Lipotyphla). Ministère des Affaires Economiques, Administration des Mines, Prof. Paper, 274: 1-20.
STORCH, G., 1993. — Morphologie und Paläobiologie von Macrouranion tenerum, einem Erinaceomorphen aus dem Mittel-Eozän von Messel bei Darmstadt (Mammalia, Lipotyphla). Senckenberg. lethea, 73: 61-81.
SZALAY, F.S., 1977. — Phylogenetic relationships and a classification of the eutherian Mammalia. In: HECHT, M.K., GOODY, P.C. & HECHT, B.M. (Eds.), Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. Plenum Press, New York, 315-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8851-7_12
SZALAY, F.S. & DECKER, R.L., 1974. — Origins, evolution, and function of the tarsus in late Cretaceous Eutheria and Paleocene Primates. In: JENKINS, F.A. (Ed.), Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York, 223-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384050-9.50013-1
SZALAY, F.S. & DRAWHORN, G., 1980. — Evolution and diversification of Archonta in an arboreal milieu. In: LUCKETT, W.P. (Ed.), Comparative Biology and Evolutionary Relationships of Tree Shrews. Plenum Press, New York, 133-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-1051-8_4
TAMBAREAU, Y., RUSSELL, D.E., SIGOGNEAU-RUSSELL, D. & VILLATTE, J., 1992. — Découverte de restes de vertébrés dans le Paléocène de Campo (Pyrénées aragonaises). Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse, 128: 73-76.
TEILHARD DE CHARDIN, P., 1927. — Les mammifères de l'Éocène inférieur de la Belgique. Mém. Mus. Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg., 36: 1-33.
THEWISSEN, J.M.G. & DOMNING, D.P., 1992. — The role of phenacodontids in the origin of the modern orders of ungulate mammals. J. Vertebr. Paleont., 12: 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1992.10011476
TULLBERG, T., 1899. — Ueber das System der Nagetiere: eine Phylogenetik Studie. Nova Acta Regiae Societatis scientiarum Upsaliensis, 18: 1-514. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.1733
VAN VALEN, L., 1967. — New Paleocene insectivores and insectivore classification. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 135: 21-284.
WILLIAMSON, T.E. & LUCAS, S.G., 1992. — Meniscotherium (Mammalia, “Condylarthra”) from the Paleocene-Eocene of Western North America. Bull. New Mexico Mus. Nat. Hist. Sci., 1: 1-75.
|
PDF
|
